Last week, Lauren Lobenhofer preached a sermon that was 1. quite good and 2. something I’ve been thinking about for a few weeks now. It centered around Jesus’ first exchange with his future disciplines on the book of John. She pointed out that in this gospel (the mystical and poetic one), Jesus’ first word are a question: “What are you looking for?” A loaded question to ask to people looking for the Messiah (similarly loaded to someone looking for a romantic partner, as Lauren pointed out). I’ve been thinking about why I’ve come to Christianity looking for ever since the second Sunday of January, which was the “baptism of Jesus” Sunday. A certain “baptism of Jesus” Sunday, five years ago, was a major turning point in my faith, because it was around the time I returned to Christianity. And now, as I return to a rather secular environment (compared to the extremely religious environments I’ve been living in for the past 8 months), I’ve realized that that question might come up again. Now that I’m in an environment where you’re not assumed to be Christian. Why are you a Christian? I’ve had people ask me that before, and I’ve given a short response; that I was raised Christian, stopped believing for a while, then realized I was happier when I was a Christian, so I chose to go back to that. But a deeper investigation is useful. For me, for others, hopefully.
Most people don’t realize I’d ever left Christianity to begin with, because I never left the church, outwardly. But for about three years, I was a closeted agnostic. I had been born and raised in the church, I was extremely involved in church, I may have been the last person anyone would have expected to have major doubts, but the doubts came on strong at the end of middle school. Could this actually be real? Was there a God? My prayer life, then, was pretty incredible. I was basically in constant prayer. I haven’t reached that level of prayer since. But as I started to wonder if I was simply deluding myself into thinking someone was listening, I started to wean myself off of prayer. I’d find myself slipping into prayer automatically and would consciously stop myself. I remember my first audition of high school, where I would not allow myself to pray. And eventually, I stopped. And I started to distance myself from religion. And I claimed the title “agnostic” under a pure logistical point--you could not disprove the existence of a God any more than you could prove it--though I personally did not believe in God.
However, I was still interested in religion as a concept. It fascinated me, belief systems. So, since I couldn’t get away from the church even if I tried, I ended up developing a set of beliefs where, if there was a God, I would believe this this and that about that God. This grew largely under the influence of one of my pastors at the time. When she left, five years ago, I realized that I had to make a choice - either firmly believe in God or firmly not believe in God. I was worried that that strange kind of “reserve faith” I’d developed would leave. And I realized that if I worried so much about it leaving me, it was important and I needed to follow it. That I was, frankly, happier believing in God. So, I went there. I chose.
It took a long time to readjust my thinking. To rebuild my faith for who I had become. In three years I made some progress, but my second year of college proved so difficult that it left me spiritually drained and I thought, “I really need to make this a priority in my life.” So I started working at Montreat, and since then I’ve really shot off like a rocket. I have so far to go to get where I want to be, but that’s a life’s work, if you’re quick about it.
So, what was it that brought me back? What is it now? What have I been looking for?
I have three main things.
I think Jesus had some darn good principles.
Quite simply, if you look at Jesus’ teachings, the root of all of them is love. Love God, love others. Resist the temptation to judge, to strike out in vengeance. Choose love instead. Learn to live with less. Spend the time you would spend caring for your possessions caring for other people. All of these make sense to me, both as ways to personally live my life and as a way to encourage society to move forward. I do believe strongly that we in America often tend towards caring more about what we have than who we’re around, and I think we could ultimately have a much better time in our lives if we flipped that around.
It has come to my attention that I do a lot of work that could be called “evangelism”, even though that’s a word I would have run away screaming from for most of my life. the word always made me nauseous even in the most innocent of settings. (As Joan Gray, former moderator of the Presbyterian Chuch (USA) and the preacher for last summer’s Worship and Music conference said, “Alright, ushers, lock the doors. We’re going to talk about evangelism.”) But, really, what else is this blog? But, in accepting my identity as an evangelist, I do not see my ministry to those outside the church as rallying to convert heathen sinners to the redemptive power of Jesus Christ. Sorry. If there is any “conversion” in what I do, it is encouraging people to convert their lives towards the path Jesus took; namely, the call to love each person and the belief that each one has value. (Acknowledging, of course, that I fall short of following that path far too often, but I am trying.) And that is a conversion that needs to happen within the church as well as outside of the church. Christ said, “I am the Way and the Truth and the Life, no one comes to the Father but through me.” DUH, yes, absolutely, Christ was the model for an ideal way of living and interacting with others. So why do we so often fail to follow that way because Christ has atoned for our sins anyway (an idea Bonhoeffer calls “cheap grace” which is the death of discipleship), and instead use this verse to condemn those who have not “professed Jesus Christ as their personal Lord and Savior” but who very well could be following the way of Christ better than those who do?
Call me a heretic. Call me blasphemous. I just think we’ve got our priorities mixed up. I’m not sent to collect souls, but hearts. And yes, I believe that you can be filled with the love of Christ and call it by a different name, and yes, I believe that not one of those names is more valid than another. And I think that getting upset over what we call it is distracting us from our main purpose, which is cultivating that love. There are many reasons someone might not embrace Christianity. There are people who have been scarred by Christianity, by hateful actions done in the name of Christ. There are people who tried Christianity but were scared away by people angrily pointing fingers at their sins while not acknowledging their own. There are people, and I think a lot more people than we think, who may have been curious about religion but didn’t grow up knowing the language, and no one has bothered to translate for them so they’ve felt stupid or like there’s something they’re not getting and have given up. I, for my part, believe that Christ had some really good ideas on how to live. I believe those ideas could probably help out most people. Thus I believe in sharing those ideas with people, and to do that, often you have to translate. If I came up to you and started speaking in Twi, you’d have no idea what I was saying. It’s the same with religion. At Pentecost, what were the disciples gifted with? Tongues. The ability to speak to people in their own languages. So why do we, as Christians, insist the people use ours? If someone winces and shuts down at the word “God”, you’re not going to get anything across. It’s possible to talk about God without using the word “God”. Probably whenever you’re talking me I’m talking about God, even if we’re in a dramaturgy meeting (actually, probably especially if we’re in a dramaturgy meeting). One of my friends said, “Well, Colleen, whenever I’m having a conversation with you, it’s a theological conversation.” Honestly, if I can get the message across to someone, the whole “love everyone” message that’s at the core of Christ’s teachings, I’ll be thrilled. If someone is curious as to where this comes from, I’m MORE THAN happy to talk about religion. I love helping people engage with religious language. I’m overjoyed when someone asks me a question about religion. I love to be that resource. I love being asked questions that other Christians wouldn’t think to ask and I don’t know how to answer. It’s awesome. But that’s not my focus. My focus is encouraging people to love other people. Period.
I am too much of a natural pessimist not to need a resurrection story as the guiding narrative of my life.
Most people I know nowadays would not call me a pessimist. But the growth of my optimism is directly proportional with my religious growth. Very much trackable. Over break, I met up with a friend from high school who I hadn’t seen since graduation, and I referenced the running joke of my appearance, that I wear a lot of black and a trenchcoat and shave my head but I’m actually a ball of fluff, but I had to stop and tell her, “Oh. I’m an optimist now.” My own realization of my optimism was a huge shock to me, and when I went up to two of my teachers and said, “I just realized... I’m an optimist,” they said, “Yes...” like that was the most obvious thing in the world. But for a long time, I functioned very much as a pessimist. I had the most cynical, bitter, negative view on life out of anyone I knew. I was absolutely convinced there was no way to make life truly worth living, that all people were inherently evil and that you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone really worth your time (including yourself), that, in the words of Sweeney Todd, we all deserve to die, and life was just an arduous process you’d try to make as bearable as you could.
And frankly, even as I grow more positive, I cannot do it in a way that denies the things that are negative in the world. Not to the extremes that I once believed, but, yes, people do some terrible things, sometimes you have an extremely hard time finding a reason to care, some relationships seem to be more work than they’re worth, sometimes you can doubt whether there’s any point to the things you’re doing, or, worse, doubt if the things you’ve already done have made any impact. It would be stupid to deny that these things are part of life. And I don’t. At all. I’ve often wondered why people have come to me for comfort because I’m not the one who’s able to say, “Oh, it’s going to be okay.” No. Often it’s not. Often it’s going to hurt like hell. It may hurt more than you know and more than you want and more than you think you can handle and I’m sorry, but nothing’s going to change that.
Christianity acknowledges that. Jesus is born, he does a lot of cool things, say some smart-but-controversial things, performs some miracles, and then the whole thing starts to crumble. One of his friends betrays him, and he’s arrested, even though he hasn’t done anything to warrant what’s about to happen. Another one of his friends denies that he knows him, three times over. Everyone who used to support him now screams for his crucifixion. He’s beaten, flogged 39 times, which is just less than the “lethal” amount (40 lashes was said to be enough to kill a person). He’s mocked, called “King of the Jews” (which he never called himself, btw), a crown of thorns is pushed onto his head, he becomes so weak that he cannot even carry his cross nobly to the hill, where he is killed in a very painful and slow method of torture. (the sign of the cross must have caused fear back then, which should be noted now when we wear crosses as earrings). Really, it doesn’t get much worse than this, which I take as the Christian acknowledgement of, “Yes. Life often sucks.”
But that’s not the end of the story. He rises again, he conquers the terrible things that have happened, into new life and new hope. There is no denial of the trials he had to go through. The scars are there on his body. But he’s alive. It’s a story written through nature, in how a devastating forest fire brings new growth, in how the coldness of winter shifts to the renewal of spring. It’s in other religions as well, the Hindu concept of the importance of Shiva, the god of destruction. You have to die before you can be resurrected. You have to fully embrace that death and suffering. But that death and suffering is not the end of the story, and as a Christian I have to say, “Yes, this is terrible, but it isn’t over,” and look to the resurrection. It’s the same thing with Job. He loses everything, is sitting there covered with boils, and says, “This isn’t over. I hate EVERYTHING right now and I don’t know why this is happening,” (which he says for approximately 36 chapters) “but this isn’t over. I know that my Redeemer lives.”
Frankly, I need to be reminded of that kind of story a lot, or else I’ll slip back into negativity that doesn’t help me or anyone around me (and I’ll have less fun). A story that does not deny anything about how hard life can be, but rather embraces it, and transforms it. I think it is deeply, maybe even morbidly beautiful that the cross was an instrument of torture and now it’s a symbol of hope. It’s nothing if not appropriate.
I love you.
Here’s where I get abstract on you, so bear with me (and if you ever panic, please return to "Jesus had some darn good principles", because these are secretly the same thing). Some people wonder how anyone can possibily believe in a God. I wonder how anyone could not believe in a God. I totally get how someone can not believe in a God who sits up in the sky looking down on us, maybe pulling some strings and controlling people. Sure. But, to me, asking “Is there a God?” is like asking, “Are you alive?” And not in the sense that I think both answers are obvious. It’s that I think they’re the same question.
You can make a case that we’re not actually alive. Or that we’re all asleep, or figments of imaginations. I enjoy those arguments (I started wearing a trenchcoat because of The Matrix), I have a good time with them, intellectually, but at the end of the day I generally decide to believe that I am alive and in the condition that I generally experience, that other people are alive and I’m not just making them up, and I continue with my life as normal.
God is too much for us to understand. That’s why we have religion... it gives us a language to talk about something we can’t understand. Even religion is filled with abstractions, like the Trinity. God is three beings in one. This is saying, “God exists somewhere between these three ideas - parent, child, spirit. We can’t pinpoint one thing--God’s bigger than that.” If you were to ask me what God is, the simplest words I could give you are two: Life, and Love.
God is Love is a phrase that has been tossed around a lot, and I think makes more sense to a lot of people than God is Life. Jesus is the example of God as the most human form, and Jesus was nothing if not loving. As he ate with outcasts and healed the sick, even (especially) as he challenged people, pushed them. The core of the message is love.
God is life is a bit tricker, but God IS life. God and existence are synonyms. God is in all things, in every moment. God is the IS. What if we were to think of “I Am That I Am” not simply meaning, “I am what/I am”, but, “I am that I Am.” I am the state of “am”. is. being. existence. Last summer, I was walking back to my room after working an intense Bible study on Isaiah, and I stopped to look at a tree, and asked myself, “What is a tree?” I could break down the tree scientifically, I can talk about its function, I can break it down to the smallest unit of a cell, but that doesn’t tell me what is IS. That IS, is God.
So the call to love God is not the call to love some old guy with a long beard up in the sky somewhere. It’s the call to love every thing and everyone. And it’s hard, it’s extremely hard because you have to push through all prejudices and hesistations and fears, but it’s something to work towards. And I suspect that the moments where your capacity to love is stretched wider and wider are the moments where you can begin to connect with the bit of God that resides within yourself, as you embrace love, which is embracing life (and all its sensation)... which is embracing God. In “
What Is Love?” (fabulous, go read it, a million times more articulate than I am) Alva NoĆ« asks, “Can you love the whole world? I suppose this is like the question, Is there a God?” God is the whole world. God is love. God IS loving the whole world. Not: The entity of God is currently engaged in the act of loving the whole world, but the definition of God is “loving the whole world”.
And we can get in on that.
What could be more fun?
“What are you looking for?”
You.